Summary Shemyakin. Shemyakin court brief retelling. "The Tale of the Shemyakin Court": plot, artistic features. Shemyakin Court main characters

Of the two peasant brothers, one was rich, the other was poor. The rich man often lent to the poor. Once a poor brother asked a rich man for a horse as a loan - there was nothing to carry firewood on. The horse was given to him, but without a collar, so the poor man had to attach firewood to the horse's tail. Due to the fact that the gate was not set, the tail of the horse came off when passing through the gate.

The poor man wanted to return the tailless horse to his brother, who refused to accept it without a tail and decided to sue his brother in the city court against Shemyaka. The poor man had to follow the rich man, because one way or another he would be forced to stand trial.

On their way to the city, they stopped in a village. The rich man was sheltered by a local priest - his old acquaintance, the poor man, lay down in the same house on a bed. The rich brother and the priest began to eat, but the poor man was not invited to the table. The poor man looked down on how they eat, and fell from the bed into the cradle, hitting the child. Pop also decided to complain about poor Shemyaka.

On the way to the judge, the poor man decided to throw himself off the bridge to avoid punishment. A man was carrying his father under the bridge. They were crossing the bridge. The poor man, flying from the bridge, crushed the peasant's father, but he himself survived. The son of the deceased also went to court. And the poor man was taken to Shemyaka. He had nothing to give to the judge, and he decided to wrap the stone with a handkerchief.

Each time listening to the complaints of the victims, Judge Shemyaka called the poor to account. The poor man showed the judge a stone in a handkerchief. Shemyaka took him for a bribe, so he judged all cases in favor of the poor. So, he must return the horse to his brother when its tail grows; the priest must give his wife to the poor until the poor gets a new child; the peasant must try to kill the poor man the way he killed his father - by throwing himself off the bridge.

After the trial, the rich man asked the poor man for a horse, but his brother refused, so as not to disobey the court's decision. Then the rich man bought his tailless horse from him for 5 rubles. The priest paid off the poor with 10 rubles. The man also did not comply with the court decision, giving the poor a bribe.

Shemyaka sent a confidant to the poor man to find out about the three bundles that were shown to him. The poor man took out a stone. He was asked what kind of stone he had? The poor man explained: if the judge judged incorrectly, he would have killed him with this stone.

When the judge found out about the threat, he was glad that he reasoned this way and not otherwise. And the poor man went home happy.

This work educates the reader in honesty, justice, teaches to feel responsible for their actions. The satire of "The Tale ..." is directed against bribery and self-interest of judges.

Picture or drawing The Tale of the Shemyakin Court

Other retellings for the reader's diary

Summary of Senka Nekrasov
Senka watched from the crack as enemy planes dived from all sides. The tobacco was over, and the body was shaking with horror. A machine gunner crawled past with a wounded arm. Immediately, someone heavy fell on Senka, it turned out to be a dead soldier.
Summary of Leskov Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk district
The young merchant Izmailova Katerina Lvovna yearns alone in a half-empty house, while her husband always spends time at work. She falls in love with the young and handsome clerk Sergei.
Summary of The Adventures of Krosh Rybakov
The book tells about a 9th grade summer internship at a car depot. Krosh did not have any technical education, but he wanted to drive a car during his internship. Instead, Krosh, together with Peter Shmakov, worked in the garage.
Summary of Gone with the Wind Mitchell
The action takes place on the Tara plantation. Land owned by Gerald O'Hare. Scarlett, his daughter, despite the fact that she keeps almost all the guys in the neighborhood as fans, is in love with Ashley Wilkes and cannot believe that he preferred the simple Melanie to her.
Summary of Paustovsky Collection of Miracles
In the story of K.G. Paustovsky, the hero sets off on a journey to Lake Borovoe together with the village boy Vanya, a zealous defender of the forest. Their path lies through the field and the village of Polkovo with surprisingly tall peasants.

Today, another work called Shemyakin Court got into my reader's diary. We met the story of Shemyakin's Court in the 8th grade at a literature lesson.

the story of the Shemyakin court

Tale of Shemyakin court talks about poverty and introduces an unfair trial, showing us a little man with his ingenuity. The work of Shemyakin's Court was written by an unknown author, and this satire dates back to the seventeenth century.

Shemyakin Court summary

In order to get acquainted with the plot of the work Shumyakin Court, we offer that it will allow us to work with the work in the future and make it. In an ancient Russian work of the second half of the seventeenth century, it tells about two brothers: a poor and a rich one. The poor man constantly asked the rich horse, and one day, taking the horse and not receiving a collar from his brother for use, the horse’s tail comes off, because the poor man had to attach firewood to the horse’s tail. The brother now does not want to take the horse and goes to court. In order not to pay tax for a summons to court, the poor brother follows.

On the way to the city, the brother stops at his friend's priest, where he invites him to the table, but the poor are not given dinner, and he only has to look out from the bed. And then the poor man accidentally falls and just on the cradle with the child. The child dies. Now the pop is going to court.

On the way, the poor brother decides to commit suicide and throws himself off the bridge, but just falls on a sleigh with a man. With his fall, he kills the father of one of the townspeople, who at that time is taking his father on a sleigh to the bathhouse.

And now three victims went to court, where the poor man showed ingenuity. During the accusations of all the crimes that fell on the loser, he showed the judge a stone. The judge, thinking about money and the fact that there was gold in the bundle, passed a sentence in favor of the accused, so the horse was left to the poor man, the wife of the priest was sent to him, who was supposed to live with him until the child was born. And in the end, the poor man had to be killed by the injured city dweller in the same way that he killed his father.

In the end, everyone paid money to the poor brother so that the court sentence would not be executed. Moreover, when the judge found out that the poor man had an ordinary stone instead of gold, he also seemed pleased with his decisions that he awarded in favor of the poor, because otherwise, the poor man would have killed him with a stone.

If we analyze the work, then we perfectly see who and what the Shemyakin Court story makes fun of. This is both bribery and injustice in judicial decisions in the days of feudalism. Reading the satirical work Shemyakin Court, one involuntarily asks the question, on whose side is the author? And here, just the case when the author does not support anyone, he simply shows all the bitterness of what is happening, where each hero deserves sympathy, although, it is unlikely that anyone will take the side of the judge. The judge can be condemned, because it was he who made unfair decisions that reached the point of absurdity.

Shemyakin Court main characters

In the Shemyakin court, the main characters are the poor and rich brothers, the priest, the city dweller and the judge Shemyakin. It was by his name that the court was named.

There lived two peasant brothers: one rich and the other poor. For many years the rich lent money to the poor, but he remained just as poor. Once a poor man came to ask a rich man for a horse to bring firewood. He reluctantly gave the horse. Then the poor man began to ask for a collar. But the brother got angry and did not give the collar.

There is nothing to do - the poor tied his firewood to the horse's tail. When he was carrying firewood home, he forgot to set up a gate, and the horse, passing through the gate, tore off his tail.

The poor man brought his brother a horse without a tail. But he did not take the horse, but went to the city to judge Shemyaka to beat his brother with his forehead. The poor man followed him, knowing that he would still be forced to appear in court.

They came to a village. The rich man stayed with his acquaintance - a rural priest. The poor man came to the same ass and lay down on the bed. The rich man and the priest sat down to eat, but the poor man was not invited. He watched from the bed what they were eating, fell down, fell on the cradle and crushed the child. Pop also went to town to complain about the poor man.

They were crossing the bridge. And below, along the moat, one man was taking his father to the bathhouse. The poor man, foreseeing his death, decided to commit suicide. He threw himself off the bridge, fell on the old man and killed him. He was caught and brought before the judge. The poor man thought about what to give him to the judge ... He took a stone, wrapped it in a kerchief and stood in front of the judge.

After listening to the complaint of the rich brother, Judge Shemyaka ordered the poor man to answer. He showed the judge a wrapped stone. Shemyaka decided: let the poor not give the horse to the rich until it grows a new tail.

Then he brought a petition pop. And the poor man showed the stone again. The judge decided: let the priest give the poor priest until he “gets” a new child.

Then the son began to complain, whose father was crushed by the poor. The poor man showed the stone again to the judge. The judge decided: let the plaintiff kill the poor man in the same way, that is, throw himself at him from the bridge.

After the trial, the rich began to ask the poor for a horse, but he refused to give it back, citing a judicial decision. The rich man gave him five rubles to give him a horse without a tail.

Then the poor man began, by a judicial decision, to demand a priest from the priest. The priest gave him ten rubles, only that he should not take the priests.

Poor suggested that the third plaintiff comply with the judge's decision. But he, on reflection, did not want to rush at him from the bridge, but began to put up and also gave the poor bribe.

And the judge sent his man to the defendant to ask about the three bundles that the poor man showed to the judge. The poor man pulled out a stone. Shemyakin's servant was surprised and asked what kind of stone it was. The defendant explained that if the judge did not judge him, he would have bruised him with this stone.

When he learned of the danger that threatened him, the judge was very glad that he judged in this way. And the poor man, rejoicing, went home.

ema: "Shemyakin Court". The depiction of real and fictional events is the main innovation in the literature of the 17th century.

Lesson Objectives : to show the ideological and artistic originality of the story as a satirical work;

develop skills

text analysis,
monologue skills,
expressive reading,
illustration descriptions.

Methodical methods: conversation on questions, teacher's comments, expressive reading by roles, elements of text analysis, story by illustrations.

During the classes

I. Checking homework.

1) Reading several essays about A. Nevsky.

2) Slide 1-2 . Conversation on the article "The Tale of the Shemyakin Court" (pp. 29 - 30)

How do you understand what a democratic l-ra is? (It was created for the people. The environment and reflected the people's ideals and ideas about power, court, the Church, truth, the meaning of life)
Who was the hero of the democratic l-ry? (ordinary people who have not accomplished anything significant for history, who have not become famous for anything. Often losers, poor people).

II. Teacher's story about democratic literature. Russian l - ra at the turn of the ΧVІІ - ΧVІІІ centuries. was a very variegated picture, characteristic of the transitional period. There was a stratification of l - ry: in parallel with literature, the democratic l - ra developed. Every year expanding in volume and more and more attracting public attention. This l - ra was created in the people's environment and reflected the people's ideals and ideas about power, court, church, truth, the meaning of life. The heroes of the works of this literature were ordinary people, the so-called "little man", not famous, often destitute, poor, disenfranchised.

In the history of Russian lit. language democratic l - ra ΧVІІ - ΧVІІІ centuries left a deep, indelible meaning. It poured two powerful streams into the bookish language developed by the previous development - folk-poetic speech and live colloquial speech, which contributed to the formation of the literary language of the era.

slide 3 One of the works of democratic l - ry is "The Tale of the Shemyakin Court". The name of the hero was associated with the name of the Galician prince Dmitry Shemyaka, who blinded his brother, the Moscow prince Vasily II and was known as an unrighteous judge. Shemyakini's name has become a household name.

P. is found both in prose and in poetic versions.

Senior of known lists prose text refers to the end of the XVII century. In the XVIII century. the prose text was transcribed in unequal syllabic verse; there are also transcriptions of the work in tonic verse and iambic six-foot.

Starting from the 1st floor. 18th century lubok publications appear (Rovinsky D . Russian folk pictures.- St. Petersburg, 1881.- Book. 1. - P. 189-192), which reproduce the plot of the work in an abridged form (they were reprinted 5 times, up to the edition with a censored note in 1838).

During the XVIII-XX centuries. numerous literary adaptations of P. appear; in the 1st third of the 19th century. The work has been translated into German twice. The name of the story - "Shemyakin Court" - has become a folk saying.

III. Reading the story by roles by pre-prepared students.

IV. Textbook discussion.

v. Additional tasks:

Plan Slide 4

1st part:

1. Two brothers: rich and poor
2. Horse without a tail
3. Fell off the board
4. Commit yourself to death

In the first part P. tells about how the protagonist commits three crimes (tearing off the tail of a horse that belonged to his rich brother; falling from the horses, knocking the priest's son to death; throwing himself from the bridge, he kills the old man whom the son was taking to the bathhouse). These three episodes can be seen as "simple forms", as unfinished anecdotes, as a plot. By themselves, they are funny, but the plot is not completed, not “untied”.

Part 2: Slide 5

5. Shemyaka referee
6. Stone wrapped in a handkerchief
7. The poor man praised God

In the second part it is described how the poor man shows the unrighteous judge Shemyaka a stone wrapped in a scarf, which the judge takes for a promise - a bag of money, for which he sentences the rich brother to give the horse to the poor man until it grows a new tail, punishes the priest to give the priest until the poor man will not “get the child”, but he also offers the son of the murdered old man to throw himself from the bridge at the murderer. The plaintiffs prefer to pay off in order not to comply with the decisions of the judge. Shemyaka, having learned that the poor man showed him a stone, thanked God: “as if I hadn’t judged by him, but he would have slapped me.”

slide 6 The comedy of these anecdotes is enhanced by the fact that Shemyaka's sentences are, as it were, a mirror image of the poor man's adventures. The rich brother is ordered by the judge to wait for the horse to grow a new tail. The judge punishes the priest: “Give him your wife to get to those places (until then) until he gets a child for you from your father. At that time, take papada from him with the child.”

Slide 7 A similar decision is made in the third case. “Go up to the bridge,” Shemyaka says to the plaintiff, “and if you killed your father, stand under the bridge, and. you yourself from the bridge fall on him, so kill him, as he is your father. It is not surprising that the plaintiffs preferred to pay off: they pay the poor so that he does not force them to comply with the decisions of the judge.

Reading the story, the Russian people of the 17th century naturally compared the Shemyaka trial with the real judicial practice of their time. Such a comparison enhanced the comic effect of the work. The fact is that according to the "Code" (code of laws) of 1649, retribution was also a mirror image of the crime. For murder they were executed by death, for arson they were burned, for minting a counterfeit coin they poured molten lead into their throats. It turned out that the Shemyaka trial was a direct parody of ancient Russian legal proceedings.

The story introduces us to the tense atmosphere of life in Russia in the second half of the 17th century. She denounced the unrighteous (“for a bribe”) legal proceedings, but with good-natured humor she painted the image of the judge himself - Shemyaka, who decided cases in favor of the poor, and not in favor of the rich and the priest.

VII. Slide 9 Try to identify the genre features of "Shemyakin Court"

"Sh. court" is defined assatirical story,
but the work is close to folklore, reminiscent of everyday fairy tale : heroes-commoners, the cunning and ingenuity of the protagonist, who turned the case in his favor.
"Sh. court" wears some features of the parable Keywords: edification, opposition of poverty and wealth, external unemotionality of the narration, construction of phrases (anaphora), parallelism of episodes.
The illustrated version of the work resembles comics

VIII. Working with illustrations. Group task:retell several episodes depicted in the illustrations close to the text.

ІΧ. Slide 10 D. h. 1. What impression did the story make on you? Prepare a detailed answer by including the expression "Shemyakin court" as a saying.

In a certain place there lived two brothers who were farmers, one rich, the other poor. The rich man lent money to the poor for many years, and could not fulfill his poverty. Once a poor man came to a rich man to ask his horse to bring firewood. His brother did not want to give him a horse and said to him: “I lent you a lot, brother, but could not fill it. And when he gave him a horse, the poor man began to ask him for a collar. And his brother got angry with him, began to revile his squalor: - You don’t even have your collar! And did not give him a collar. The poor man left the rich man, took his firewood, tied his horse by the tail, went into the forest and brought it to his court. He hit the horse with a whip, but forgot to set up the gateway. The horse, with all its might, rushed through the doorway with the cart and tore off its tail. The poor man brought a horse without a tail to his brother. The brother, seeing that his horse was without a tail, began to reproach his wretched brother because, having begged for a horse, spoiled it, and, without taking a horse, went to beat him with his forehead in the city to Shemyaka the judge.

("Shemyakin Court")

Test on "The Tale of Shemyakin Court"

A1 . Determine the genre of the work from which the fragment is taken.

1) fairy tale 2) story 3) life 4) teaching

A2 . What is the place of this fragment in the work?

opens the narrative
completes the story
is the climax of the story
is one of the stages in the development of the plot

A3 . The main theme of this piece is:

debt theme
the theme of human inner freedom
labor theme
theme of different life of two brothers

A4. What determines the lifestyle of a poor brother?

desire to get rich
caring for rich brother
the desire to take more from a rich brother
desire to help all people

reveals the absence of a human element in the hero
shows disregard for the goodness of a brother
characterizes psychological condition hero
emphasizes the social position of the hero

IN 1. Indicate the term by which in literary criticism words are characterized that have become obsolete over time (“yoke”, “vilify”, “wood firewood”).

AT 2. Name the means of creating the image of the hero, based on the description of his appearance (from the words: "Went miserable ...")

AT 3. From the paragraph beginning with the words: “And when he gave ...”, write out a word that characterizes the attitude of a rich brother to the ignorance of a poor one.

AT 4. Explain the meaning of the word forehead

C1. What does the expression mean"shemyakin court" ? which of the two brothers was wrong? Why? Preview:

2nd part: 5. Shemyaka judge 6. A stone wrapped in a scarf 7. The poor man praised God 5

The poor man shows the unrighteous judge Shemyaka a stone wrapped in a scarf, which the judge takes for a promise - a bag of money for which he sentences the rich brother to give the horse to the poor until it grows a new tail, punishes the ass to give the popad until the poor man does not " will get the child, ”and the son of the murdered old man also offers to throw himself from the bridge at the murderer. 6

Engraving on copper, first half of the 18th century. From an illustration for the fairy tale "Shemyakin Court", first half of the 18th century). From the Rovinsky collection. “Climb up to the bridge,” Shemyaka says to the plaintiff, “and when you kill your father, stand under the bridge, and you yourself from the bridge turn on him, so kill him, as he is your father.” It is not surprising that the plaintiffs preferred to pay off: they pay the poor so that he does not force them to comply with the decisions of the judge. 7

Do you think the poor man's brother is a positive or negative image? (YES, positive. NO, negative) 2. Do you think poor brother is a positive or negative image? (YES, positive." NO, negative) write down in the table justify your position on the controversial issue using key words. As a result, a similar table could appear: Yes (for) No (against) 1. Entrepreneurship 2. Activity 3. Pressure 4 1. Obsession 2. Deceit 3. Cowardice 4. Insolence 5. Insolence 8

Genre features of "Shemyakin's Court" A satirical story Reminiscent of an everyday fairy tale Find the features of the parable What do the illustrations on page 33 remind you of? 9

D. h. 1. What impression did the story make on you? Prepare a detailed answer by including the expression "shemyakin court" as a saying. 3. Read "Undergrowth". 10

Resources http://www.peoples.ru/state/king/russia/dmitriy_shemyaka/shemyaka_7.jpg http://wiki.laser.ru/images/thumb/e/e4/%d0%a8%d0%b5%d0 %bc%d1%8f%d0%ba%d0%b8%d0%bd_%d1%81%d1%83%d0%b4.jpg/240px-%d0%a8%d0%b5%d0%bc%d1% 8f%d0%ba%d0%b8%d0%bd_%d1%81%d1%83%d0%b4.jpg http://www.rusinst.ru/showpic.asp?t=articles&n=ArticleID&id=4951 http: //www.ozon.ru/multimedia/books_covers/1000491396.jpg 11

And the publishers of the Nikolsky market. It was published by Pypin in Kalachov's Archive of Historical and Practical Information Relating to Russia (1859).

Encyclopedic YouTube

The brothers traditional for fairy tales - the rich and the poor - quarrel because the poor spoiled the rich man's horse. Since the rich did not give a yoke, the poor had to tie the sleigh to the tail of the horse. As he rode through the gate, he forgot to put out the gateway, and the horse's tail broke off. The rich man refuses to accept the horse and goes to the city to complain about his brother to the judge Shemyake. Petitioner and defendant travel together. A second involuntary misfortune happens to the poor man: during sleep, he falls from the bed into the cradle and kills the priest's child. Pop joins the rich. At the entrance to the city, the poor man decides to commit suicide and throws himself off the bridge, but falls on a sick old man, who was being driven across the ice to the bathhouse by his son. The victim also goes to the judge with a complaint.

During the trial, the accused shows Shemyaka a stone wrapped in a scarf. The judge is sure that this is a “promise”, and decides all three cases in a very peculiar way: the horse must remain with the poor until its tail grows; the priest gives his wife to the poor man so that the priest may have a child from him, and the third plaintiff can take revenge on the poor man in exactly the same way that the latter killed his father. It is quite natural that the plaintiffs not only waive the penalty (fines), but give the defendant a generous reward in the form of compensation.

It is further narrated that the judge sends his scribe to receive a bribe from the poor man, but, having learned that the latter showed him not money, but a stone intended to “bruise” the judge in the event of a guilty verdict, he thanks God for saving his life. So everything characters the stories remain one way or another satisfied with the outcome of the case, which ended happily only thanks to the simplicity of the poor man.

Editions

In the first half of the 18th century, 12 pictures for "Shemyakin's Court" were engraved at the Akhmetyevskaya factory, with the text printed later by Rovinsky; the popular edition was repeated five times, and in last time, already with a censored mark, printed in 1839. The further development of the story was expressed in later literary adaptations in the style of The Adventures of the Poshekhonians, for example, in the book published in 1860 The tale of Krivosud, and how the naked Yerema, the granddaughters of Pakhom, at the neighbor of Thomas a large chrome, created misfortune and other things". The whole comedy of this "Fairy Tale" rests on the development of a well-known theme: "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth", caricatured in a farcical spirit.

Editions of the story about Shemyakin Court:

"Archive" Kalachov (1859; Book IV, pp. 1-10);
"Monuments" by Kostomarov (Issue II, pp. 405-406);
“Folk Russian tales” by Alexander Afanasiev (ed. A. Gruzinsky, M., 1897, vol. II, pp. 276-279; see);
Buslaev's "Historical Reader" (pp. 1443-1446);
"Collection Department Russian language and literature of the Academy of Sciences" (vol. X, No. 6, pp. 7-12);
"Russian Folk Pictures" by Rovinsky (book I, 189-191, book IV, pp. 172-175);
"Chronicles literature" Tikhonravov (vol. V, pp. 34-37);
a separate publication of the Society of Lovers of Ancient Literature (St. Petersburg, 1879, etc.).

Research

Until Eastern and Western parallels were brought to the case, the Shemyakin Court was viewed as a completely original, very ancient work of Russian satire, associated with the general view of Russian people on the sad state of legal proceedings; explained with proverbs such as with the clerk, hang around, and keep the stone in your bosom”, and even commented with some articles on the Code by Alexei Mikhailovich and Tales of foreigners about Russia in the 17th century. ".

besides the name Shemyaka, scientists were occupied with the accidental victory of eternal truth over human falsehood, carried out in the story, albeit with a touch of some irony. Buslaev did not doubt its Russian origin and was only surprised that the type of judge Shemyaka, from the wise and just (biblical Solomon), took on the opposite connotation, and instead of a story-admonition, the story of Shemyakin's court descended to a playful parody, despite the early, Eastern prototypes . Buslaev believed that the additions to the story were expressed in satirical antics against the crooked judgment and bribery with promises, as phenomena of a later time, that is, the legend turned into an ordinary satire on Russian clerks. Sukhomlinov explained this seeming opposition by various principles, from which the version of Shemyak was gradually formed, and in the decline of morality he sees the influence of the Semitic legends about the four Sodom judges - the "Deceiver" (Shakray), the "Deceiver" (Shakrurai), the "Faker" (Zaifi) and "Krivosude" (Matslidin). Like Jewish legends, in the Russian story the serious is mixed with the funny; That's why " favorite ideas of folk literature about the victory of truth over falsehood, about saving the unfortunate from malice the mighty of the world merge with features from the legend of the courts, common among the Indo-European and Semitic peoples» . In the Shemyakin Court, the judge justifies the poor man, who has committed essentially involuntary crimes, and thereby saves him from the revenge of people who are morally guilty, thanks to which the satire on bribery has not lost its edifying purpose, - this is how A. N. Veselovsky looked at the trend of the story: of course, the judge puts the questions casuistically, but in such a way that the fines fall with all their weight on the plaintiffs and they prefer to abandon the claim.

Binding to a historical character

Particularly intriguing was the historical name of the famous Galician Prince Dmitry Shemyaka, who barbarously blinded Vasily Tyomny. Sakharov even cited the words of some Russian chronograph, who connected the saying with a historical event: “ from this time in great Russia on every judge and admirer in reproach, nicknamed Shemyakin court". In the same spirit, Karamzin also circulated this observation of the old Russian scribe: “ having no rules of honor, no prudent state system on his conscience, Shemyaka, in the short time of his reign, increased the attachment of Muscovites to Vasily, and in civil affairs themselves, trampling justice, ancient charters, common sense with his feet, he left forever the memory of his iniquities in a folk proverb about the Shemyakin court, still in common use". Solovyov and Bestuzhev-Ryumin repeat the same thing. Alexander Nikolaevich Veselovsky was the first to point out the accidental application of the eastern name Shemyaki to the historical personality of the Galician prince of the 15th century.

Western parallels

Wondering how this legend came to us, and on the basis of the direct evidence of Tolstoy's list of "Shemyakin Court of the 17th century" (written out from Polish books), Tikhonravov believed that " in its present form, the satirical story about the court, already baptized by the name of Shemyaki, went through the alteration of a Russian person and received purely folk colors, but individual episodes could be borrowed from Polish books", and pointed to the anecdote "About an accident" in the popular story " The adventures of a new entertaining jester and a great rogue in matters of love, Conscience-Dral, a big nose”(a bricklayer falls from a high tower and kills a man sitting below), as well as one episode in “Figei Kach” by the 16th-century Polish writer Mikołaj Rey from Naglowice about the accused who “showed the stone to the judge” .

Eastern parallels

The German philologist Benfey cites a Tibetan tale that served as an intermediate link between the alleged Indian source and the Russian Shemyakin Court: a poor Brahmin borrows a bull from a rich man for work, but the bull runs away from the master's yard; on the way to the judge, the brahmin falls from the wall and kills the wandering weaver and the child who was sleeping under the clothes on which the traveler sat down to rest. The verdicts of the judge are distinguished by the same casuistry: since the plaintiff did not “see” that a bull was brought to him, then his “eye” should be gouged out; the defendant must marry the weaver's widow and have the child live with the injured mother. The German folklorist noticed the same similarity with the Indian tale of the Cairo merchant, which probably also goes back to an unknown Buddhist source. Such a well-proportioned and stable in details legend refers rather to

Year of writing: 17th century

Genre of work: story

Main characters: Shemyaka- judge, brothers- peasants.

Plot

There were two brothers in the village, one poor and one rich. The poor man needed a horse to transport firewood. He turned to his rich brother for help. He gave, but without a collar. The sleigh had to be tied to the tail. But forgetting to put a doorway, the poor man left the animal without a tail. The rich man went to the judge, the brother followed him, realizing that he would be called anyway. On the way to the city, the travelers stopped for the night at the priest's. The poor man fell off the bed and crushed the child. And trying to commit suicide fell on an elderly man and he also died. In response to the accusations, the poor man shows Shemyaka a wrapped stone. The judge thinks it's a bribe. He ordered the horse to remain with the poor until the tail grows back, to make a new child with the butt, and the old man's son can take revenge by falling on him in the same way. The plaintiffs give money to the defendant in order not to carry out the sentence. And the judge, having learned that there was a stone in the bundle, thanks God for salvation.

Conclusion (my opinion)

The story is satirical. Reveals the deceit and dishonesty of judges. Plaintiffs are doing the wrong thing by dragging an innocent man to trial. Although he certainly deserves punishment, he does not have malicious intent in his heart. The described events could have been avoided, do not be greedy with a collar.

In this lesson, you will remember the genre of satire, learn about the origin and spread of the plot of the story "Shemyakin Court", consider the plot of this work, analyze it, and compare the topic of judging in other works.

One can also draw such a parallel as modern newspaper parodies, as a rule, of politicians or other influential people, where they appear ugly and stupid. That is, they often laugh at what actually frightens, annoys, interferes with life.

Throughout the world, and especially in Russia, such a thing has often been and is the court. The unrighteousness of the Russian court caused criticism even in the 15th-16th centuries (Fig. 2).

Rice. 2. Satirical image of the judges ()

The venality of judges, their chicanery and the unfairness of the court, the fact that the poor are always at a loss, but the rich win, that an unequal, dishonest trial takes place - all Russian literature and numerous historical documents groan about this. The theme of the unrighteousness of the court is the theme of the story "Shemyakin Court".

The story "Shemyakin Court" exists in different versions. In the 17th century, one can see two versions - poetic and prose, which are also known in the 18th-19th centuries. There were numerous popular prints of Shemyakin's Court.

Lubok pictures- uncomplicated, but very colorful, juicy drawings with some text. These are pictures for the people, which were published, and then the peasants (and sometimes poor townspeople) hung them on their wooden walls (Fig. 3).

Rice. 3. Lubok picture ()

"Shemyakin Court" is a popular, beloved story, which was thus spread throughout Russia. In the end, the story became so popular that it has already gone into folklore - they began to tell tales about Shemyakin's court. This is an interesting case when not an oral tradition receives a written processing, but vice versa - an oral story that exists among the people without an author is obtained from a book. It turns out that there are many texts of this work, but there is no single, ideal one. It's not the word order that matters, but the story itself, the plot.

There were two brothers. One is rich, the other is poor, poor. The poor constantly turned to the rich for help. Once he had to bring firewood from the forest, but his horse was not there (Fig. 4).

He went to his older (rich) brother and asked for a horse. He cursed, but gave the horse, however, without a collar.

collar- a horseshoe-shaped device (wooden arc), which is hung, attached to the horse's back. Shafts are attached to the yoke, and thus the weight falls on the yoke and does not put pressure on the horse's neck. This is no less valuable device than the wheel. Made it in the Middle Ages. The antiquity of the clamp did not know.

The poor brother does not have a collar, and he does not think of anything better than tying a sleigh with firewood to the tail of a horse (Fig. 5).

Rice. 5. The poor man leads the horse by the reins ()

With this load (with firewood), he tries to drive into his yard and cuts off the unfortunate horse's tail. Then he tries to return the horse with its tail torn off to his brother. The rich brother is angry and beats his forehead in court - he decides to sue his younger brother.

The brothers go to the city where the judgment will take place. For the night they settle in the house of one priest. While the rich brother and the priest eat and drink, the poor man lies on the stove and eats nothing. He is envious, he is interested in what a rich brother eats with a priest friend. A hungry, inquisitive poor man hangs from the stove, does not hold back, falls and knocks the owner's little child to death. After that, the unfortunate priest also goes to beat his forehead to the judge.

Then the three of them go. The poor man thinks that this will be his end - he will be sued. To bring everything together at once, he throws himself upside down from the bridge - he wants to commit suicide. And again becomes an unwitting killer. The fact is that just under this bridge a sleigh passes. A certain young man is taking his old father to the doctor (and according to another version - to the bathhouse). The old man is dying. After that, the son of the murdered man goes to the same court.

The situation becomes completely hopeless for the poor man, who is a bungler and a klutz and always involuntarily commits some ugly deeds.

All this trinity comes to court, where Judge Shemyaka sits, and present their case. The poor man thinks: "Well, what can I do?". He takes a stone, ties it with a handkerchief and puts it in his bosom. The rich brother presents the case to the judge. Shemyaka asks the defendant: "Tell me how it was". He pulls out a stone hidden in a scarf from his bosom and says: "Here you are, Judge". The judge thinks that this is a bribe and there is gold or silver. After that, the judge interrogates the next plaintiff - the priest. Pop makes the point. The judge again asks the poor man: "How was it?". He again does not answer anything, but only shows the stone. The third plaintiff also tells his story, and everything is repeated anew.

What was Shemyakin's court like? What did the highly experienced and wise judge award? Regarding the horse, he said: Let the horse stay with his younger brother, and as the tail grows, let him return it to his older brother.. Regarding the priest's son, he says the following: “Let the priest’s wife live with her younger brother, give birth to a child from him and return back to her husband with a child”. Regarding the third case, the judge was also not at a loss: “The murder is committed, we must take revenge in the same way. Let the poor man stand under the bridge, and let the son dead old man from above it will rush at him and beat him to death.

After listening to the wise judge, of course, the plaintiffs got scared. Everyone began to promise the unfortunate poor man money so that he would not comply with the decisions of the judge. The poor man takes the money and, joyful, goes home. But not immediately, because a man sent from Judge Shemyaka comes and says: "Give what you promised the judge". The poor man unfolds his handkerchief, shows a stone and says: “If the judge did not judge in my favor, I would have hit him with this stone”. The answer is given to the judge. The judge is glad, he offers a prayer of thanksgiving to God: “It’s good that I judged by him, otherwise he would have beaten me to death”.

As a result, everyone is more or less satisfied that they got off cheaply. But most pleased is the poor man who walks away singing songs, because his pockets are full of money. And it could have turned out really bad.

In the people of the 17th-18th centuries, this story evoked a lively reaction, namely, great pleasure - they laughed. If we perceive this story realistically, as a life story, then we get continuous troubles and nonsense. It's time to cry, not laugh. But still, this is satire, farce, clowning, farce. This should be understood as an anecdote, as a kind of deliberately distorted, comical and in its own way cheerful way of life.

Also, this text should have been received with joy, because it has a certain pathos - the victory of the weak over the strong. The poor man got into trouble, but happily got out.

Most of the people to whom this text was addressed are simpletons (people who are poor and weak in social terms). In life, everything was different, but here the poor man wins. Moreover, he wins not because he has a mind, or money, or strength - he does not have any of this. He is generally erratic. He's even stupid. But he becomes a simpleton trickster beloved by the people. He somehow everything turns out by itself in a kind of magical way, he triumphs. His simplicity turns out to be stronger than worldly customs, worldly wisdom, cunning and experience of a judge. It brought unconditional joy.

In the center of the story is a mockery of judicial orders, judicial chicanery and hypocrisy. This topic is as old as the world. Many peoples were engaged in this to one degree or another - both in folklore and in the theater.

All stories about judges can be conditionally divided into two groups: stories about wise and correct judges and stories about stupid and dishonest judges. The ideal and wise judge is the biblical Solomon. Solomon is a sage and virtuoso judge who acts paradoxically. The most famous history when two women were arguing about whose child. Solomon, not knowing the truth, made a wonderful decision: since they are arguing for him, let no one get it, let each get half, let the warrior cut the child in half. Then one of the mothers who claims to be mothers says: “Well, let it not get either to me or to her”. The second says with tears: “No, I refuse, then let the second woman take him”. After which Solomon gives the child, of course, to the one who wanted to save his life. It was a real mother (Fig. 6).

Rice. 6. Judgment of Solomon ()

Solomon acts in an unexpected, paradoxical way and in such a crooked, roundabout way achieves truth and truth. And we, the listeners of this story, admire his skill and virtuosity.

In any case, the story about the court should be intricate, intricate, with non-obvious behavior of the judge. He may be an evil briber, he may be righteous and wise, like Solomon, but he must act in a non-standard, paradoxical way.

Shemyaka's solution is an example of casuistry. He seems to act logically, but in fact he makes absurd decisions, acting against obvious things, against common sense. But that's how the whole story is. After all, this is a series of all sorts of tricks and paradoxical events, some kind of clown antics of the poor man and Judge Shemyaka.

But Shemyaka outwitted himself, outwitted himself, fell for his own hook. And his paradoxical solutions serve the cause of truth. Because the poor man, of course, is a loser and a blockhead, but there is no evil intention in him, everything that he does, he does involuntarily. A rich peasant (his brother) and a priest, it would seem, are normal people who personify the normal course of things and worldly order, the reliability of social life. But they don't work very well. They are actually dragging the innocent to court, because he does all his deeds unintentionally. And their deeds are shown as morally condemnable, because they wanted to rip off the last from the poor and punish him for what he was essentially not guilty of. Strictly speaking, the poor man deserved a slap in the face. You can’t live like that, he is generally dangerous for civilians with his strange ways of living, lying on the stove, throwing himself from bridges, etc. But he has no bad intent, which means there is no corpus delicti, which means there is nothing to judge for.

If we summarize all of the above, it turns out that we are dealing with an unbelievable thing. In the ordinary world, everything happens differently: of course, the court should have been on the side of the priest and the rich, of course, you can’t deceive the judge like that, you can’t outwit it, of course, the poor man had to lose.

never-before- this is a genre of folklore where incredible things happen: bears fly across the sky (Fig. 7), cows jump over the moon, as in English folklore.

Rice. 7. Bear flying through the sky ()

This is a world that does not exist, but I want it to exist. Everything is upside down in it: the weak wins, the court is right. This is a fabulous world of folk desires, folk fantasies about life. That is why he is so beautiful.

There are many unheard-of stories in Russian folklore. And not only in Russian.

This history is borrowed, borrowed, that is, taken from the neighbors - from the Europeans. Similar stories are found in German and Polish literature of the time. More scientists have found a large number of parallels in the East. There are similar plots in the Indian, Tibetan, Muslim traditions. This so-called wandering plot is one of those stories that wander from people to people, reflecting something very important and typical for people.

There is one Tibetan story that coincides almost one to one with the story "Shemyakin Court". It is about how a poor Brahmin asked another man for a bull to work with. There was a similar story: the bull ran away from the yard when it was already returned. On the way to the court, the brahmin falls from the wall of the weaver, who dies, then he sits on the baby, which is covered with clothes. The judge decides to gouge out the bull's owner's eye because he "didn't see" the bull when he was brought in, the weaver's widow must marry a Brahmin, and the child is returned to the unfortunate mother in the same way as in Shemyakin's Court.

It seems to be the same story, but the horse is not a bull, and the Russian peasant is not an Indian Brahmin. The details and intonation of the narrator creates different images. As a result, completely national characters arise, which bear the imprint of the local area, the local features of the language, worldview, etc.

Therefore, the story "Shemyakin Court" is very local, all grown up on Russian soil, although the seeds were brought from abroad. This story is reflected in our language. Until now, when it comes to an unjust, bad, crooked court, they say: "Shemyakin Court".

"The Tale of Ersh Ershovich" is an untitled work of the 16th-17th centuries. This is also a satirical story.

Namelessness is a common thing in the literature of that time, at least in Russia. Especially when the story is based on folklore.

This is a story about what was happening in Russia at that time. Again, the theme of this story is judgment.

Much of this story is incomprehensible to the modern reader, because a lot of the realities of that time are described. To fully understand it, you need to know the then social relations: who is who, what the names of certain estates mean, etc. .

In the story there are humanized animals - fish. We all know fairy tales and fables in which a similar thing happens: a bear is a big boss, an imperious person; the fox is a sly one who represents the characteristic social elements, and things like that. This principle is simple and clear.

In this story, the action takes place among the fish in Lake Rostov. There really is such a lake; the city of Rostov the Great stands on its shore. In the story there are going to court big people- judges. Sturgeon, Beluga, Catfish - all these are large, venerable, imposing fish. They represent the boyars (chiefs). Smaller fish, worse - these are worse people, respectively. Perch represents the forces of law and order. He is something like the police, and he has a snout to match. The smallest, lousiest, most useless fish, representing the smallest, lousy, worthless person, is the Ruff fish.

Ruff is a small, bony and prickly fish. He has needles on his back with which he pricks the enemy. Ruff represents in this story a type of plebeian (pugnacious, importunate, sneaky) - such a very irreverent and dashing type.

This Ruff is accused of having survived from the lake of its rightful owners by deceit, cunning, through all sorts of machinations. Naturally, Yorsh unlocks. He, on the contrary, wants to accuse, slander, call his accusers more unpleasant.

This story was read and listened to with pleasure just by "small" people - the poor, who did not like rich and sedate people and irritated them in every possible way. Therefore, sympathy may have been on the side of Ruff. Although it is difficult to figure out which of them is right.

There are different manuscripts that have different alternate endings. In one version, Ruff is condemned and whipped, and the lake is returned to its true owners. In another ending, Ruff spits in the eyes of his judges and hides in brushwood (in the thickets).

Such a duality of the ending shows the duality of this story, because it is impossible to say exactly on which side the author's sympathy is. Everyone looks stupid, reduced, as it should be in satire.

Ruff is a deliberately dashing, unpleasant, anti-social character, but he has the charm of a rogue, a rogue, a clever and very cocky guy who succeeds in everything. And this charm partly speaks in his favor. This story and the position of the narrator are ambivalent - dual.

The composition "Humpbacked Horse" is well known to everyone. This is a cheerful verse in the folk spirit, where the dashing Humpbacked Horse, a mythical character, acts with his master, the simpleton Ivan, who becomes a prince.

Pyotr Pavlovich Ershov (Fig. 8), a younger contemporary of Pushkin, when writing this work, drew inspiration from folk poetry and from Russian classics, including pre-Petrine classics.

Rice. 8. Pyotr Pavlovich Ershov ()

The action takes place in some conditional pre-Petrine antiquity. The Moscow kingdom is presented before any innovations and reforms according to the Western model. Accordingly, the story contains many realities of that time, including literary ones.

It is quite natural that Ershov turned to the literature of the past and, in particular, to the well-known Tale of Ersh Ershovich. Yershov has his own fish court, which reproduces the judicial procedure of that time.

Consider the difference between the fish court in "Ruff Ershovich" and in "Humpbacked Horse". Everything in folklore is serious. Of course, everything is funny and comical, but the procedural norms of that time are discussed seriously. The detailed enumeration, the realism of the description of the judicial procedure, combined with the fact that the characters are fish, creates the main comic effect.

In Yershov, the comic effect is created according to the same laws, but he does not aim to seriously describe the judicial procedure. His description is purely decorative. That is, there is no element of satire, social criticism and serious content are completely absent. He uses this to draw a cheerful, bright picture and entertain the reader.

In The Little Humpbacked Horse, in the course of action, the hero Ivan arrives at the court of the fish king (Fish-Whale). He needs to find some thing buried at the bottom of the sea. He comes to the decision to send a ruff for this thing (the chest with the queen's ring). Because he is walking, runs everywhere along all sea (and not only sea) coasts, knows every bottom. He will definitely find what he needs.

"Bream, heard this order,
Nominal wrote a decree;

Som (he was called an adviser)

Signed under the decree;
Black cancer decree folded
And attached the seal.
Two dolphins were called here
And, having given the decree, they said,
So that, on behalf of the king,
Ran all the seas
And that ruff-reveler,
Screamer and bully
Wherever found,
They brought him to the emperor.
Here the dolphins bowed
And they set off to look for the ruff."

In this passage, we meet a catfish and a ruff, which are also in the folk story, but at the same time, dolphins, which are not and cannot be in it. Dolphins carry out the order rather stupidly, because it is useless to look for such a ruff as a ruff in the seas. Of course, he is in a simpler place - in the pond, where they find him doing his favorite pastime - he fights and swears. Here is the scene:

“Look: in the pond, under the reeds,
Ruff fights with crucian carp.

"Quiet! Damn you!
Look, what a sodom they raised,
Like important fighters!" -
The messengers shouted to them.

"Well, what do you care? -
Ruff shouts boldly to the dolphins. -
I don't like to joke
I'll kill them all at once!"
"Oh, you eternal reveler
And a screamer and a bully!
All would be, rubbish, you walk,
Everyone would fight and scream.
At home - no, you can’t sit! .. "

Everyone knows this type in life: a screamer, a bully, a bully, a fighter.

In the end, the ruff is sent for the chest, and he fulfills the order with honor. But before executing, it acts as follows:

“Here, having bowed to the king,
Ruff went, bent over, out.
I quarreled with the royal household,
Behind the roach
And six salakushki
He broke his nose on the way.
Having done such a thing,
He boldly rushed into the pool.

Ruff, of course, is a stupid character, but there is a benefit from him - he fulfills the order. There is some charm in it in this work, as well as in a folk tale.

There is also a dualistic view of the characters in the Russian literary tradition - both folk and author's. It seems that he is a dashing person, and a petty hooligan, but at the same time he is brave, savvy and understands the matter when necessary.

It is worth paying attention to a funny moment: the author Pyotr Ershov could not help but think about the correspondence between his surname and his character. His literary son is Ersh Ershovich doubly.

Bibliography

1. Korovina V.Ya. etc. Literature. 8th grade. Textbook in 2 hours - 8th ed. - M.: Education, 2009.

2. Merkin G.S. Literature. 8th grade. Tutorial in 2 parts. - 9th ed. - M.: 2013.

3. Kritarova Zh.N. Analysis of works of Russian literature. 8th grade. - 2nd ed., corrected. - M.: 2014.

1. Internet portal "Akademik" ()

2. Internet portal “Festival of Pedagogical Ideas. "Public lesson" " ()

Homework

1. Explain why the story "Shemyakin Court" is a satirical work.

3. Analyze the image of the poor in the story. What attitude does it evoke in you? Why?

Literature Grade 7. Textbook-reader for schools with in-depth study of literature. Part 1 Team of authors

The Tale of the Shemyakin Court

In some places there lived two farming brothers: one rich, the other poor. The rich man loaned many years to the poor, but could not correct his poverty.

After some time, the poor man came to the rich man to ask for a horse, so that he would have something to bring firewood for himself. The brother did not want to give him a horse, he says: “I lent you a lot, but I could not fix it.” And when he gave him a horse, and he, taking it, began to ask for a collar, his brother was offended by him, began to revile his wretchedness, saying: “You don’t have your collar either.” And did not give him a collar.

The poor man left the rich man, took his firewood, tied his horse by the tail and brought it to his yard. And he forgot to put the doorway. He hit the horse with a whip, but the horse, with all its might, rushed with the cart through the gateway and tore off its tail.

And so the poor man brought a horse without a tail to his brother. And his brother saw that his horse did not have a tail, and he began to abuse his brother, that, having begged the horse from him, he spoiled it. And, not taking back the horse, he went to beat him with his forehead in the city, to Shemyaka the judge.

And the poor brother, seeing that his brother went to beat him with his forehead, went himself behind his brother, knowing that they would still send for him from the city, and not go, so he would also have to pay the bailiffs travel tickets.

And they both stopped in a certain village, not reaching the city. The rich man went to spend the night to the priest of that village, then that was the one he knew. And the poor man came to that priest, and when he came, he lay down on his beds. And the rich man began to tell the priest about the death of his horse, for which he was going to the city. And then the priest began to dine with the rich, but the poor are not invited to eat with them. The poor man began to watch from the tray what the priest and his brother were eating, fell off the tray and crushed the priest's son to death. And he also went with a rich brother to the city to beat the poor with his forehead for the death of his son. And they came to the city where the judge lived; and the poor follow them.

They walked across the bridge near the city. And from the inhabitants of the city, someone was taking his father by a moat to wash his father. The poor man, knowing that he would be killed by his brother and priest, decided to put himself to death. And rushing, he fell on the old man and crushed his father to death. They grabbed him and brought him to the judge.

He pondered how to get rid of misfortune and what to give to the judge. And, finding nothing at home, he thought of it this way: he took the stone, wrapped it in a scarf, put it in his cap, and stood before the judge.

And so his brother brought his petition, a lawsuit against him for a horse, began to beat the judge Shemyaka with his forehead. Shemyaka, having listened to the petition, says to the poor: “Answer!” The poor man, not knowing what to say, took out a wrapped stone from his cap, showed it to the judge, and bowed. And the judge, teasing that the poor man promised him a bribe, said to his brother: “If he tore off your horse’s tail, do not take your horse from him until the horse’s tail grows. And when the tail grows, at that time take your horse from him.

And then another judgment began. The priest began to look for the death of his son, for the fact that he crushed his son. The poor man again took out the same knot from his hat and showed it to the judge. The judge saw and thinks that in another case another knot of gold promises, he says to the priest: “If he hurts your son, give him your wife-badass until he gets a child for you from your asshole; at that time, take from him a popada along with the child.

And then the third trial began for the fact that, throwing himself from the bridge, he killed the old father of his son. The poor man, having taken out a stone wrapped in a scarf from his hat, showed it to the judge for the third time. The judge, teasing that for the third trial he promises him a third knot, says to the one whose father was killed: “Go up to the bridge, and let him who killed your father stand under the bridge. And you yourself from the bridge fall down on him and kill him just like he was your father.

After the trial, the plaintiffs and the defendant left the order. The rich man began to ask the poor for his horse, and he answered him: “According to the judicial decree, as they say, her tail will grow, at that time I will give your horse.” The rich brother gave him five rubles for his horse, so that he would give it to him, albeit without a tail. And he took five rubles from his brother and gave him the horse. And the poor man began to ask the priest, according to the judicial decree, so that he could get a child from her, and when he got it, give him back the hitch with the child. The priest began to hit him with his forehead so that he would not take his hits from him. And he took ten rubles from him. Then the poor man began to say to the third plaintiff: "According to the judge's decree, I will stand under the bridge, but you go up to the bridge and rush at me just as I did at your father." And he thinks: “I’ll throw myself, so, go ahead, you won’t hurt him, but you’ll hurt yourself.” He also began to put up with the poor, gave him a reward for not ordering him to throw himself at himself. And so the poor man took from all three of them.

The judge sent a servant to the defendant and ordered him to take those shown three knots. The servant began to ask him: “Give what you showed the judge from the hat in knots; He told me to take it from you." And he, taking out a tied stone from his hat, showed. Then the servant says to him: “What are you saying to the stone?” And the defendant said: “This is for the judge. I de, - he says, - whenever he began to judge not by me, I killed him with that stone.

The servant returned and told the judge everything. The judge, after listening to the servant, said: “I thank and praise God for judging him. If I didn’t judge by him, he would have hurt me.”

Then the poor man went home rejoicing and praising God.

Questions and tasks

1. What kind of humor is used in this piece?

2. Explain the meaning of the title of this work. What moral values are affirmed and which are denied in the work?

3. Why did the poor farmer win all three lawsuits?

4. Describe the image of Shemyaka.

5. Explain the ideological meaning of the ending of the work. Why do both the poor man and Shemyaka praise God at the end of the story?

6. What folklore features did you notice in the story?

7. Prepare a retelling of "Shemyakin's Court" on behalf of the judge.

This text is an introductory piece. From the book Russian poets of the second half of the XIX century author Orlitsky Yuri Borisovich

An ordinary story It was a wonderful spring! They were sitting on the shore - The river was quiet, clear, The sun was rising, the birds were singing; The dol stretched beyond the river, Calmly, luxuriantly green; Near the scarlet rose hips bloomed, There was an alley of dark lindens. It's been a wonderful spring! They were sitting on the shore - In the prime of life

From the book Reviews author Saltykov-Shchedrin Mikhail Evgrafovich

ALEXANDER VASILIEVICH Suvorov-Rymniksky. Historical story for children. Op. P. R. Furman, in two parts, with 20 pictures drawn by R. K. Zhukovsky. Ed. A. F. Farikova. Saint Petersburg. 1848. Type. K. Kraya. In the 12th day of l. 144 and 179 pages *** SAARDAM CARPENT. A story for children. Op. P.

From the book Road to Middle Earth author Shippy Tom

THE TALE OF BEREN Opinions may vary on this tale, and I am now getting to the point where I feel Tolkien would disagree with me. It is clear that in some sense he valued the story "Of Beren and Lúthien" above all that he had written. It was the fruit of one of

From the book Notes on Pushkin's Prose author Shklovsky Viktor Borisovich

secular story

From the book Resisting Nature author Pirogov Lev

What is this story about? Five works have been named - finalists for the next Belkin Prize, awarded for the best story of the year. I will share my impressions. Three good stories and two, let’s say, “objectively reflecting the state of the literary process” reached the final. I would name two of the good ones,

From the book All Works school curriculum Literature in brief. 5-11 grade author Panteleeva E. V.

"Asya" (The Tale) Retelling At the age of twenty-five, N. N. goes abroad. He is young, healthy, cheerful and rich. A young man travels without a specific goal, he is not interested in boring monuments, but in people. On the waters, N. N. was carried away by a young widow, but the woman preferred

From the book History of Russian Literature of the 19th Century. Part 2. 1840-1860 author Prokofieva Natalia Nikolaevna

Historical story Beginning of the 19th century. in Russia was the time of the awakening of a comprehensive interest in history. This interest was a direct consequence of the powerful rise in the national and civil self-consciousness of Russian society, caused by the wars with Napoleon and especially

From the book History of Russian Literature of the 19th Century. Part 1. 1800-1830s author Lebedev Yury Vladimirovich

Fantastic story Fantastic, as one of the elements of the pre-romantic and early romantic story in the stories of the 1820-1930s, becomes the main feature of the genre and develops into an independent genre, which was retained in literature in subsequent times. 1820-1830s

From the book Stone Belt, 1976 author Gagarin Stanislav Semenovich

A secular story That specific circle, which was called the “big light” (the writer Count V.A. Sollogub called his story “The Big Light”) or “light”, attracted the attention of Russian writers in the 1820-1830s and became the subject of artistic images and study in

From the book In disputes about Russia: A. N. Ostrovsky author Moskvina Tatyana Vladimirovna

Everyday story In the process of development of romantic prose of the 1820s-1830s, a special genre variety was formed, which is often called everyday (or moralistic) story. Its formation as an independent genre occurs in conjunction with the previous

From the book Heroes of Pushkin author Arkhangelsky Alexander Nikolaevich

Fantastic story "Viy" To this day, the story remains one of the most mysterious of Gogol. In a note to it, Gogol pointed out that "this whole story is a folk tradition" and that he conveyed it exactly as he heard it, almost without changing anything. However, so far not

From the author's book

Secular story. The movement towards a secular story began already in the early works of A. A. Bestuzhev-Marlinsky: “Evening at the Bivouac” (1823), which influenced Pushkin’s story “The Shot”, and “A Novel in Seven Letters”, which reveals the conflict of an outstanding hero with secular

From the author's book

The story "Overcoat". Halfway from the first volume of "Dead Souls" to the second is Gogol's last St. Petersburg story "The Overcoat", which differs sharply from "Nevsky Prospekt", "The Nose" and "Notes of a Madman" in the peculiarities of its humor and the scale of comprehension of the topics.

From the author's book

DETECTIVE STORY

From the author's book

Russian history in the "conscientious court" The time when A. N. Ostrovsky wrote historical dramas in verse takes a little more than a decade. In 1862, a version of the play "Kozma Zakharyich Minin, Sukhoruk" was published, in 1872 - "Comedian of the 17th century." After that, leaving history and

From the author's book

"Kirdzhali" Tale (novel, 1834)

"The Tale of the Shemyakin Court" is an ancient Russian literary work of folk art. On our website you can read "The Tale of Shemyakin's Court", which is presented in a fabulously satirical form. It tells about the dishonest and negligent judge Shemyak. It is assumed that the Grand Duke of Moscow Dimitri Shemyaka became the prototype of the protagonist, but this theory has no evidence.

"The Tale of the Shemyakinsky Court" very brief content

There lived two brothers: one was poor, the other was rich. Somehow a rich man did not give a collar to a poor man, and the poor man attached firewood to the tail of a horse, whose tail was then torn off. The rich man went to court. He stopped at the priest, but they didn’t give him food, and he fell off the bed and crushed the child. The poor man, out of despair, decided to commit suicide, but killed the old man when he fell.

The poor man wrapped a heavy stone in a rag. Judge Shemyaka told his brother to wait for the horse's tail to grow. Popu ordered to give the priest before the birth of a new child. And he advised the son of the murdered man to throw himself off the bridge and crush the poor man.

After such a trial, both the priest, and the rich man, and the son of his father paid off the resourceful peasant. Then an assistant judge came to the poor man and asked what was in the bundle, to which the peasant replied that this is a stone, with which he could kill Shemyaka if he held a trial not in his favor.

Read also "The Tale of Peter and Fevronia of Murom" by Yermolai Erasmus is a masterpiece of ancient Russian literature. The work was written in the middle of the 16th century, based on Murom oral traditions about the life of Peter and Fevronia, who ruled in Murom in the 13th century. For a reader's diary, we recommend reading.

A short retelling of "The Tale of the Shemyakinsky Court"

There is nothing to do - the poor tied his firewood to the horse's tail. When he was carrying firewood home, he forgot to set up a gate, and the horse, passing through the gate, tore off his tail.

Then he brought a petition pop. And the poor man showed the stone again. The judge decided: let the priest give the poor priest until he “gets” a new child.

After the trial, the rich began to ask the poor for a horse, but he refused to give it back, citing a judicial decision. The rich man gave him five rubles to give him a horse without a tail.

Then the poor man began, by a judicial decision, to demand a priest from the priest. The priest gave him ten rubles, only that he should not take the priests.

Poor suggested that the third plaintiff comply with the judge's decision. But he, on reflection, did not want to rush at him from the bridge, but began to put up and also gave the poor bribe.

When he learned of the danger that threatened him, the judge was very glad that he judged in this way. And the poor man, rejoicing, went home.

This is interesting: The reason for the birth of the literary work “The Word about the destruction of the Russian land” was the invasion of hordes of the Tatar-Mongols into the Russian land. It was written no later than the middle of the 13th century. On our website you can read for the reader's diary.

About "The Tale of the Shemyakinsky Court" for the reader's diary

Shemyakin Court summary for the reader's diary.

Year of writing: XVII century

Genre of work: story

Main characters: Shemyaka - judge, brothers - peasants.

Plot:

The rich man went to the judge, the brother followed him, realizing that he would be called anyway. On the way to the city, the travelers stopped for the night at the priest's. Falling off the bed, the poor man crushed the child. And trying to commit suicide fell on an elderly man and he also died.

In response to the accusations, the poor man shows Shemyaka a wrapped stone. The judge thinks it's a bribe. He ordered the horse to remain with the poor until the tail grows back, to make a new child with the butt, and the old man's son can take revenge by falling on him in the same way.

The plaintiffs give money to the defendant in order not to carry out the sentence. And the judge, having learned that there was a stone in the bundle, thanks God for salvation.

Conclusion (my opinion):

Audio The Tale of the Shemyakinsky Court

The heroes of the story “Shemyakin Court” are the rich and the poor, the brothers-farmers, the priest, the “resident of the city”, whose father was killed by the poor, and the judge Shemyaka. Main character story committed three crimes: "teared off" the tail of a horse; fell off the platform and killed his son; about to commit suicide, he jumped off the bridge and crushed his grandfather, whom his son was taking to bathe to bathe.

Each of the characters is right in their own way. Each misfortune in the story is a consequence of the previous one, so it is difficult to say which side the author is on - at certain moments he sympathizes with each hero.